1. Home
  2. Wine
  3. Regions
  4. Californian
  5. Wine
  6. Clif – The Climber Zinfandel Blend

Clif – The Climber Zinfandel Blend

4.13K
0

This is the second time we’ve reviewed Clif’s The Climber Red Blend.  The 2006 version we reviewed was comprised of the same 5 varietals (zinfandel, cabernet sauvignon, syrah, merlot and petite syrah); however, in similar fashion to how Clif’s winemakers have managed The Climber white, they’ve made some significant changes to the percentages.  In the 2009, Zinfandel dominates the blend at 63%, followed by cab and syrah at 21% and 12 %, respectively.  Petite syrah and merlot make up the difference at 2% each.

Consequently the characteristics of the wine have changed, although only slightly.  On the nose the wine hints at the rich blueberry and black fruit the wine offers on the palate.  But the wine also offers up mild aromas of licorice, gingerbread and coffee.  On the palate, the wine is a bit jammy, with blueberry dominating the fruit profile.  There are cedary notes and pepper that lead to a finish that is ever-so-slightly hot (alcoholic).  But it doesn’t compromise the wine.  Actually, I think it adds some much needed character and distinction.

Clif The Climber Zinfandel Blend

Overall, this is a well-made wine that offers a lot of forward fruit for the money.  But the wine is a bit deficient in structure and acid, which leaves it a bit out of balance.  Clif’s white wine offering does a better job of maintaining that balance.  Just a hint more of oak or acid would make for a more memorable experience.  I have confidence that Clif’s winemaker’s will eventually find that balance.  Keep your eye on this one.

Wine: Clif – The Climber
Variety: Zinfandel blend
Vintage: 2009
Alcohol: 14.1%
Rating: 87
Price: $14.00

Find Clif – The Climber Zinfandel Blend with Snooth

Disclosure: This wine was received as a sample.

Tim Lemke Tim is the founder and chief reviewer at Cheap Wine Ratings since 2007.

Comment(0)

  1. I think you should try another bottle. I found this wine explosive on the front palate with ripe black berry fruit. Didn’t get the high alcohol. more oak acid would have improved the ageability and balance, then the wine would compete in the $40 range…you should appreciate the wine for what it is, a deliciously simple niche wine that can be enjoyed with or without food now…a steal at $14.

  2. George, thanks for your comments. I’d gladly try another bottle as I quite enjoyed this wine. And I think this is a very good wine at the $14 price point. However, I don’t think it’s a steal…yet. A wine need not cost $40 to offer an appropriate balance of oak, forward fruit and acid, or some distinction. Case in point, I sit here responding to your comment, enjoying a glass of Lake Sonoma 2009 Alexander Vally Cabernet, a wine that will flat blow the doors off The Climber for only another $5 or $6. Keep in mind 87 is a good score for a $14 wine.

    Cheers.

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *