<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barefoot Shiraz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheapwineratings.com/2009/03/04/barefoot-shiraz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheapwineratings.com/2009/03/04/barefoot-shiraz/</link>
	<description>Good Value Makes Wine Taste Better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:36:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eggs-actly &#171; eating bender</title>
		<link>http://cheapwineratings.com/2009/03/04/barefoot-shiraz/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Eggs-actly &#171; eating bender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapwineratings.com/?p=188#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>[...] We also enjoyed some leftover wine from the night before. On our quest to find the best cheap wine, we came across Barefoot Shiraz, which apparently earned a &#8220;gold medal&#8221; &#8211; so why not try it? The wine glass below was actually from Saturday and the stemless wine glass above is from Sunday. It definitely tasted its best when we first opened the bottle, but overall it wasn&#8217;t bad. A good, cheap choice! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We also enjoyed some leftover wine from the night before. On our quest to find the best cheap wine, we came across Barefoot Shiraz, which apparently earned a &#8220;gold medal&#8221; &#8211; so why not try it? The wine glass below was actually from Saturday and the stemless wine glass above is from Sunday. It definitely tasted its best when we first opened the bottle, but overall it wasn&#8217;t bad. A good, cheap choice! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://cheapwineratings.com/2009/03/04/barefoot-shiraz/comment-page-1/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapwineratings.com/?p=188#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>I prefer the sweet spot of $10-$20, finding many really quite remarkable wines in that range.  But Barefoot Cellars, to my thinking anyway, consistently produce perfectly enjoyable table wine at a very attractive price, often $6 around me, $5 by the 1.5 bottles. I can&#039;t think of anyone else  that does quite as well at that price point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the sweet spot of $10-$20, finding many really quite remarkable wines in that range.  But Barefoot Cellars, to my thinking anyway, consistently produce perfectly enjoyable table wine at a very attractive price, often $6 around me, $5 by the 1.5 bottles. I can&#8217;t think of anyone else  that does quite as well at that price point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey O</title>
		<link>http://cheapwineratings.com/2009/03/04/barefoot-shiraz/comment-page-1/#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapwineratings.com/?p=188#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>Often I find Barefoot priced at $4.99. Their Zinfandel is pretty decent, well balanced and nice flavors. I&#039;d like to try their Shiraz, especially since it is described as not jammy.  On the downside, the NV status could mean a much different tasting experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often I find Barefoot priced at $4.99. Their Zinfandel is pretty decent, well balanced and nice flavors. I&#8217;d like to try their Shiraz, especially since it is described as not jammy.  On the downside, the NV status could mean a much different tasting experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty</title>
		<link>http://cheapwineratings.com/2009/03/04/barefoot-shiraz/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapwineratings.com/?p=188#comment-941</guid>
		<description>About 3yrs ago someone brought a NV Barefoot Zin over my house for a party....  It is still sitting here and I&#039;m afraid to open it now...  I doubt the NV&#039;s are meant to go the distance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 3yrs ago someone brought a NV Barefoot Zin over my house for a party&#8230;.  It is still sitting here and I&#8217;m afraid to open it now&#8230;  I doubt the NV&#8217;s are meant to go the distance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://cheapwineratings.com/2009/03/04/barefoot-shiraz/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapwineratings.com/?p=188#comment-940</guid>
		<description>I agree with your take on Barefoot.  In a blind tasting of Cab S, a Barefoot was my favorite, though the wines were all $15 or less.  It was just about the only wine that wasn&#039;t too alcoholic, jammy or oaky.  No flaws, nothing obnoxious.  You could do much worse for the money.

I recall on another occasion that a different Barefoot, a Merlot maybe, was pretty awful.  So bottle to bottle things may not be too consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your take on Barefoot.  In a blind tasting of Cab S, a Barefoot was my favorite, though the wines were all $15 or less.  It was just about the only wine that wasn&#8217;t too alcoholic, jammy or oaky.  No flaws, nothing obnoxious.  You could do much worse for the money.</p>
<p>I recall on another occasion that a different Barefoot, a Merlot maybe, was pretty awful.  So bottle to bottle things may not be too consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
