CheapWineRatings.com

Good Value Makes Wine Taste Better
Greg said on March 4th, 2009

I agree with your take on Barefoot. In a blind tasting of Cab S, a Barefoot was my favorite, though the wines were all $15 or less. It was just about the only wine that wasn’t too alcoholic, jammy or oaky. No flaws, nothing obnoxious. You could do much worse for the money.

I recall on another occasion that a different Barefoot, a Merlot maybe, was pretty awful. So bottle to bottle things may not be too consistent.

Dirty said on March 4th, 2009

About 3yrs ago someone brought a NV Barefoot Zin over my house for a party…. It is still sitting here and I’m afraid to open it now… I doubt the NV’s are meant to go the distance

Mickey O said on April 1st, 2009

Often I find Barefoot priced at $4.99. Their Zinfandel is pretty decent, well balanced and nice flavors. I’d like to try their Shiraz, especially since it is described as not jammy. On the downside, the NV status could mean a much different tasting experience.

Mike said on October 27th, 2009

I prefer the sweet spot of $10-$20, finding many really quite remarkable wines in that range. But Barefoot Cellars, to my thinking anyway, consistently produce perfectly enjoyable table wine at a very attractive price, often $6 around me, $5 by the 1.5 bottles. I can’t think of anyone else that does quite as well at that price point.

Track & Pingback
Trackback and pingback from other bloggers
November 10th, 2009 at 9:35 am Eggs-actly « eating bender mention something about this post....

Leave A Reply

 Username

 Email Address

 Website